Answer:
This one is true.
Explanation:
Is this the question you wanted me to answer...
According to the given question and statement, the appropriate thesis statement will be as follows: "Today's youth lack the manners that the previous generation did."
The self is the foundation of morality. While some behaviours can be recognised as improper or immoral by oneself, other filters can only be acquired through one's environment. The younger generations are indeed becoming more rude. It is also true that their morality is influenced by the situation of the world at the time this occurs.
Although it would be grave injustice to generalise that all children and youngsters lack morals and manners, the overall trend would undoubtedly indicate that there has been a significant drop among many of them.
Family values have drastically changed over the past few decades, resulting in a generation of rebellious teenagers and young children that lack morality and manners due to inadequate upbringing. When it comes to manners, young people used to be very aware of the older generation. Giving up a seat on the bus, saying "please" and "thank you," and holding open doors were all regarded as polite behaviour. Nowadays, the majority of people live in a "me-first" world, which is reflected in many young people.
Therefore, If good manners are instilled in children at a young age, they will typically remain a part of their personality well into adulthood. Without a doubt, the environment found in the house is a reflection of the lack of manners seen in society as a whole. It is conceivable that the children will badly lack in manners if there is no parental example and no training in this area.
Learn more about 'good manners' here-
brainly.com/question/4786003
#SPJ10
Answer: d. it describes an insolvable argument between a husband and his wife, threatening to deteriorate into tears.
Explanation:
To understand how to figure misplaced / dangling modifiers, we must first understand the message that the sentence is trying to convey to us. So let us take a look at the answer choices:
A. The veterinarian, found in the woods with a broken leg, offered to help the dog.
Was the veterinarian found in the woods with a broken leg? And if so, by whom? And if they had a broken leg, why are they concerned with helping the dog, who seems to be fine?
I do not think that answer A is the right choice, so let's move on.
B. Found in the woods, the veterinarian offered to help the dog with a broken leg.
Aha, at least now the dog has something that requires the help of the veterinarian. But why is the veterinarian being found in the woods? Is he some sort of hermit?
Probably not. Moving on!
C. Found in the woods with a broken leg, the veterinarian offered to help the dog.
Now, we are completely stumped as to what was found in the woods with a broken leg. Because it's unclear, we can dismiss it as an option choice.
D. The veterinarian offered to help the dog found in the woods with a broken leg.
NOW we're onto something! The dog was found in the woods with a broken leg, and the veterinarian offered to help. From the looks of things, this makes the most sense, and therefore, option D is the correct answer.
Hope that helped! =)
The irony is that they are smiling with “torn and bleeding hearts”.
The idea it emphasizes is that they are smiling to hide their pain.
The overall message revealed by the irony is that they are in considerable emotional turmoil and faking happiness to mask their distress.
