Answer:
Trade was also a boon for human interaction, bringing cross-cultural contact to a whole new level. When people first settled down into larger towns in Mesopotamia and Egypt, self-sufficiency – the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything that you wanted or needed – started to fade. A farmer could now trade grain for meat, or milk for a pot, at the local market, which was seldom too far away. Cities started to work the same way, realizing that they could acquire goods they didn't have at hand from other cities far away, where the climate and natural resources produced different things. This longer-distance trade was slow and often dangerous but was lucrative for the middlemen willing to make the journey. The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan around 3000 BC, historians believe. Long-distance trade in these early times was limited almost exclusively to luxury goods like spices, textiles, and precious metals. Cities that were rich in these commodities became financially rich, too, satiating the appetites of other surrounding regions for jewelry, fancy robes, and imported delicacies. It wasn't long after that trade networks crisscrossed the entire Eurasian continent, inextricably linking cultures for the first time in history. By the second millennium BC, former backwater island Cyprus had become a major Mediterranean player by ferrying its vast copper resources to the Near East and Egypt, regions wealthy due to their own natural resources such as papyrus and wool. Phoenicia, famous for its seafaring expertise, hawked its valuable cedarwood and linens dyes all over the Mediterranean. China prospered by trading jade, spices, and later, silk. Britain shared its abundance of tin.
Explanation:
The answer is <span>family members.</span>
Explanation:
I can't change your mind as I think same.
Military chief, the power to veto laws
The ethical path of the information is illustrated below.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Emotivism is a theory that claims that moral language or judgment is neither true nor false. It encourages us to express our emotions; try to influence others to agree with us.
According to emotivism, Jane Doe should tell her parents about her sexual attraction and Joe and Mary should go for IVF.
Also, ethics is the principle of right or wrong. It's not based on what's written in the religious books. These principles help an individual how to learn how to be in a society, and how to be legally privileged. Natural law ethics will agree with the decision because these are ethically appropriate.
Joe and Mary had lost their first child and they need to go for IVF for their second child. There is nothing wrong with this and it's legally and ethically approved for parents who are not fertile to go for IVF.
The unethical path is that Jane Doe has a sexual attraction toward same-sex and this is an act of lesbianism. This is unethical.
Learn more about ethics on:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
