Investigators should keep in mind that eyewitness identification is highly infallible. true, since the law takes the identification as a positive test and completely commits those involved and an error in it could tarnish the course of justice and consequently of the investigators.
Answer:
(A) -> (D) -> (C) -> (B)
Explanation:
First off, given that the problem requires us to explain how life on Earth may have arisen <u>from terrestrial origins</u>, we can discard sentence (E), as impacts from meteorites would count as extraterrestrial origins.
Then it's just a matter of describing the steps by which simple compounds turned into more and more complex structures, that would in turn lead to the origin of life.
Simple inorganic compounds (such as CO₂, or NH₃) were exposed to energy, because of that they formed simple organic molecules, like carbohydrates or amino acids.
These organic molecules, in turn, would self-assemble into more complex structures, such as proteins.
Lastly, there's the phenomenon of Compartmentalization, where large organic structures became enclosed within a membrane-like structure, separating them from the 'outside' medium and thus creating primitive cells.
Yes i think so, but not sure
Answer:
C) Practicing good scientific method and practices.
Explanation:
The text states, "repeating the experiment multiple times," as well as other preparations that a good scientist uses.
Doing something multiple times over is a good sign of a good scientific method.
Taking careful measurements, having several researchers run the same experiment, and only testing one variable at a time are all good practices that a scientist should use.
<em> </em><em><u>The</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>correct</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>C</u></em><em><u>)</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>