1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Talja [164]
3 years ago
11

How was John Marshall’s interpretation of the Constitution different from that of Thomas Jefferson’s? A) Jefferson believed that

judicial review was implied in the Constitution; Marshall did not. B) Marshall believed the Constitution implied strong state powers; Jefferson did not. C) Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not. D) Jefferson believed the federal courts could overrule state courts; Marshall did not.
History
2 answers:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
5 0

John Marshall’s interpretation of the Constitution differed from that of Thomas Jefferson because (C); John Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Thomas Jefferson did not. John Marshall political philosophy was one that of a federalist approach.  

Mariana [72]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

<em>Marshall’s interpretation of the Constitution was different from that of Thomas Jefferson’s in that Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not. </em>

John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.  


You might be interested in
9
Katen [24]

Answer:

An intellectual movement emphasizing reason over tradition: 2. Enlightenment

Something obvious: 3. Self-evident

The act of overthrowing one government in favor of another: 1. Revolution

8 0
3 years ago
One reason the United States entered World War I was because of A. the sinking of the Lusitania. B. an invasion by the British.
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer: A) the sinking of the Lusitania

Explanation: The other three options can be eliminated pretty easily:

B) is not correct because the British never invaded the United States, especially not during WWI, as we were on their side

C) is not correct because the bombing of Pearl Harbor occurred during WWII

D) is not correct because NYC was never bombed

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the last years of the 20th century, immigrants into the United States were MOST likely to come from
Elza [17]

Immigration to the United States is the international movement of individuals who are not natives or do not possess citizenship in order to settle, reside, study or to take up employment in the United States. It has been a major source of population growth and cultural change throughout much of the history of the United States. The economic, social, and political aspects of immigration have caused controversy regarding ethnicity, economic benefits, jobs for non-immigrants, settlement patterns, impact on upward social mobility, crime, and voting behavior. Causing them to come into the U.S. as a "new opportunity."

6 0
3 years ago
American Indian tribes were relocated to reservations in the 1850s because the federal government wanted:
zmey [24]

Answer:

American Indian tribes were relocated to reservations in the 1850s because the federal government wanted "to give white settlers more land", however it is also true that many whites wanted the natives to have their own land, but this was not the primary reason.  

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is thought that the early bantu migrations circa 1000 bce through africa were caused by
Andru [333]
Bantu is loosely translated as “people,” which refers to a group of about 500 different African languages in Africa. Most of the first Bantu speakers have lived in the area in the west side of Africa, known today as Nigeria and Cameroon. Their migrations were mostly caused by agriculture and iron-working.

Since the innovation of agriculture had started to cultivate in the Bantu speakers, their search for land to plant yams and oil bearing palms was reason enough for them to migrate into different parts of Africa. Crops became a part of their daily life as well as herding domestic goats. They needed an area where they can expand this practice and to accommodate their growing population.
<span>
Another reason is iron. When iron started to be worked on, they crafted tools that facilitated ease in their “slash-and-burn” type of agriculture. Iron was also made into good weapons that were used as trade items that pushed the Bantu speakers to occupy other lands that are interested in their craft. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following could be found on Wall Street by 1850s?
    12·1 answer
  • What did England expect from the colonists
    10·1 answer
  • President Nixon began a policy of measured troop withdrawals from Vietnam. What was this policy called? de-escalation /detente/
    6·2 answers
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
  • 0 points which of the following was one of the policy changes thomas jefferson made when he became president?
    6·2 answers
  • What does the baneful effects of the spirit of the party mean?
    6·1 answer
  • If Thanos concern was a fear of running out of space and resources why didnt he just make a surpluss amount of resourses and mor
    9·2 answers
  • How did the era of Westward Expansion and Industrialization transform American culture and force Americans to confront tradition
    5·1 answer
  • How was<br>Janga bahadur<br>rana Came is power, Crime​
    13·1 answer
  • Some technological Space Race legacies would include products like
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!