<span>They had no voting rights unless they owned land.
Hope I Helped!!
Mark Brainliest!!</span>
<span>Henry Clay of
Kentucky and Daniel Webster Massachusetts were the pair of legislators
who were known for their ability to compromise on states’ rights, federalist
issues, and sectional issues. Henry Clay
had negotiated compromises before such as MISSOURI COMPROMISE which was set
because of the division of congress due to issues of slavery and COMPROMISE
TARIFF OF 1833. Daniel Webster was the one who helped Clay in his proposals; he
spoke to convince his <span>colleagues to draw near to Clay’s proposal.</span></span>
It depends. The true definition, with is roughly law without force, then it wouldn't be too bad. Sounds like it would just be a non corrupt world. However, modern day groups like ANTIFA, it would suck. Things have been blown out of proportion honestly to the point where anarchy, or "anti-fascism", almost looks like fascism.
Followed by an
American force led by the future president William Harrison, the British-Indian
force was beaten at the Battle of the Thames River on October 5. The
clash gave control of the western theater to the United States in the War of
1812. Tecumseh’s death marked the termination of Indian confrontation east of
the Mississippi River, and soon after most of the tired tribes were forced
west.
