Answer:
Number 1?
Explanation:
if your looking for a fine cut answer then I would go with Number 1 but in reality none of these answers are correct southerners did not welcome the abolishment of slavery in anyway. While legally slavery was no more it was replaced with other systems like share cropping that continued to oppress minorities, as well as segregated bathrooms, schools and water fountains many minorities found it near imposable to find stable job from discriminative white business owners.
A peasant is considered to be a farmer and would give free service to the lord and his land. This is in exchange for their rent on the land owned by the lord and for the food provided by the crops grown in the lord's land. They would work for three times in a week or longer, if it is harvest time. A peasant was not permitted to change their abode or move to another place. They needed to become a freeman first. In order to become a freeman, he needed to pay his debt to the lord or buy a piece of his land. The status of being a peasant or serf will be passed onto the descendants.
Um the legislative is what i feel like is the answer hopefully i helped
Everything tbh. But they can't and can at the same time. See the dilema here is that for the goverment if there were not any problems concerning animals and such then people would start become more problamatic towards the goverment about things they dont want to disscus. the goverment is weird and sneaky like that. We dont know what is real and what is not.
