They do not cause more harm then good
this is all I think that is is sorry that I coundent help with they others and thanks for the its
White Man's burden. It was common in around 1899, when <span>British novelist and poet Rudyard Kipling wrote a poem entitled “The White Man's Burden: The United States and The Philippine Islands..” , urging the US to spread democracy to those less fortunate than them. Really, it was an excuse for imperialism, and to forcefully spread their religion. </span>
Answer:
i will give u 4! hope this helps!
Explanation:
#1 Charlemagne united most of Western Europe for the first time since the Roman Empire.
#2 Charlemagne was the first emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.
#3 Charlemagne played a vital role in the spread of Christianity across Europe.
#4 He was the driving force behind the Carolingian Renaissance.
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
