Answer:
The Correlation analysis “R” is measured to compute the strength of relationship among variables. Moreover, the value of correlation is calculated among -1 to +1. Which implies that if the computed value is near to -1 then there will be strong but negative relation and if near to +1 then it is strong but relation among the variable. However zero is consider as neutral point.
A. The computed value of correlation is - 0.772. The value identifies that that there is a strong but negative association among the variables (GDP and infant mortality rate).
B. The correlation analysis cannot computed among the variables continent and GDP because "continent" is a categorical variable not quantitative.
C. The computed value of correlation is higher than 1. Thus, the statement implies that there is a very strong relationship among life expectancy and GDP which is incorrect. As the association cannot be higher than 1.
D. There is a strong relationship among literacy rate and GDP as the relationship is nearer to 1. Furthermore, the association among literacy rate and GDP doesn’t suggest the causation.
E. The computed correlation among the variables is 0.90. Which indicated that the variables goes up. That is, when the GDP goes down the import is also decrease and when GDP increases the import increases Thus, the there is a positive correlation.
Answer:
A circular definition is one that uses the term(s) being defined as a part of the definition or assumes a prior understanding of the term being defined. There are several kinds of circular definition, and several ways of characterising the term: pragmatic, lexicographic and linguistic.
Answer:
I think the answer to your question is true(not sure sha)
- The district court will first determine if there is a conflict between state and federal law with regard to the matter at hand before deciding whether to apply state or federal law.
- If there is a contradiction between the appropriate state and federal laws, the district court must determine whether a valid federal statute or Federal Rule addresses the contested matter.
- If there is no applicable federal act or regulation, the court must decide whether federal common law or state law should be applied.
- When a "uniquely federal interest" is at risk and a considerable conflict arises between that interest and the operation of state law, the Supreme Court has also acknowledged the application of federal common law.
<h3>Federal district court took decision -</h3>
- If there are significant, overriding federal interests at stake that require the application of federal law, a federal court may still apply federal common law.
- Such federal interests are evident in this case, as was previously discussed.
Learn more about federal district court brainly.com/question/12368109
#SPJ4
Answer:
organization-centered career planning
Explanation:
According to the information in the question, it is correct to say that the case of Carmelo fits into a organization-centered career planning, because Carmelo grew in the organization in a progressive sequence, joined as a team reporter and was climbing new roles until reaching a higher hierarchical position as your current position as editor of the magazine's business department.
Organization-centered career planning can be very beneficial to employees when the organization is well structured through a culture that enables the growth of employees and professional advancement in the company.
