1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
miss Akunina [59]
4 years ago
10

By 1967 the size of anti war protests showed that

History
2 answers:
PolarNik [594]4 years ago
6 0

war against Vietnamese independence or an intervention in a foreign civil war others opposed it because they felt it lacked clear objectives and appeared to be unwinnable.

Natalka [10]4 years ago
4 0

Answer: opposition to the war was no longer radical

Explanation:

You might be interested in
14.
DanielleElmas [232]
Answer:C

Soviet Union and USA were going back and fourth creating new inventions and always trying to one up eachother
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help if ur good at American history
Anastasy [175]

The answer is the first one

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A good historian needs a lot of patience.<br><br> True<br> False
jenyasd209 [6]
I would go with True because any historian needs a lot of patience to get what they want or to learn about something etc..
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt below from the Supreme Court ruling in the Scott v. Sandford. [T]he legislation and histories of the times, and
omeli [17]
The main point of this excerpt is that African-Americans were not considered US citizens.

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Scott is suing for his freedom from slavery. This is because his master brought him to the Wisconsin territory, a territory where slavery was outlawed.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. The reason why they ruled against him is based on the excerpt above. The Declaration of Independence did not make it blatantly clear that slaves were considered citizens. Since they were not considered citizens, they had no legal rights that slave owners had to respect.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did trade flourish along the silk road
brilliants [131]

Trade flourished because these progressing empires were developing new ways to produce products and utilize agriculture in their areas, such as Han with silk and Rome with olives and fishing/seafaring. These empires has never had access to goods that were from other areas before the Silk road, causing trade to become immensely popular and relied upon. 

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which American political leader made the above address?
    11·2 answers
  • Wars between Christians and Turks
    6·1 answer
  • What contributions did bernardo de galvez make to the american revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe how the government of the Roman Republic contributed to the development of democratic principles such as the separation
    14·1 answer
  • How does Truman describe the Japanese
    14·1 answer
  • When was the wall street crash
    15·2 answers
  • What was charles darwin's theory regarding plant and animal life?
    14·1 answer
  • Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!please
    6·1 answer
  • What principle of colonial government protects citizens from having their rights unjustly taken away?
    6·1 answer
  • Identify whether each statement regarding the Lewis and Clark expedition is true or false by using the drop-down menus. Cataloge
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!