A primary source is someone who was there at the time the event happioned or an artifact from that time line
secendairy source (sry 4 my bad spelling) is something from after the event or writen from after the event
Answer:
Menes was the first pharaoh of egypt .
<h2>Please mark me as brainlist. </h2>
They felt resistance from Congress and therefore the state assembly as a result of their new constitution took power from the states and utterly restructured the Congress within the Articles.They felt resistance from Congress and therefore the state assembly as a result of their new constitution took power from the states and utterly restructured the Congress within the Articles.
Answer:
The Founding Fathers of the United States were the political leaders who signed the United States Declaration of Independence, participated in the American Revolution or contributed to the drafting of the United States Constitution a few years later. Among them, they emphasize by their historical importance Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, James Madison, Thomas Paine and Alexander Hamilton.
These men were characterized mainly by sharing among themselves a series of political and social values, which were the pillars on which the bases of the United States of America were created as a nation.
Mainly, the Founding Fathers shared liberal thoughts. They believed in freedom as the basis of all civil law and political ideology. In addition, the concept of democracy was detached from freedom, as opposed to British monarchical despotism. To avoid this, the establishment of a republic, governed by its citizens, was proposed.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
