Answer:
EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO A TEMPORARY SITUATION.
Explanation:
Attribution theory deals with how the social perceiver uses information to arrive at causal explanations for events. It examines what information is gathered and how it is combined to form a causal judgment.
Explanatory style is the characteristic, habitual way individuals explain the causes of good and bad events they experience.
Stressful events can either be good or bad. People may attribute stressful events to factors that are either temporary or permanent and specific or universal.
Carmela's thought means she is explaining her stressful work (event) by attributing it to a temporary situation since she thinks she will get the hang of it in a few months.
Therefore, an example of the explanatory style is EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO TEMPORARY EVENTS.
Answer: compare and contrast the characteristics of the academic and practitioners research communities and explain which audience is going to present it's findings to and whyIdentify an example of a development project and what type of team you believed they used? Answer the questions to receive full credit:1) What factors should the firm take into account when deciding the make up of the teamincluding whether it should centralize its R&D activities?2) Describe an alternative type of team (or second approach - team construct, centralized activities, collaboration, etc.)FOR BOTH QUESTIONS SOME LEVEL OF COMPARISONS OF GOOD AND BAD
Explanation:
Answer:
Unitary cost= $118
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Production= 43,000
Direct materials $43.00 per unit
Direct manufacturing labor $8.00 per unit
Variable manufacturing costs $4.00 per unit
Fixed manufacturing costs $63.00 per unit
<u>The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable.</u> The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.
Unitary cost= 43 + 8 + 4 + 63
Unitary cost= $118
Answer: Costs of items used up this period but paid for next period
Explanation:
Period Expenses for the period are transactions that should be expensed because they were used in the current period.
Therefore if a period cost is not used in the period, it is not considered a period cost even if the company pays for it in the current period which also means that if a period cost for the period is not paid in the current period but in the next one, it is still a period cost for the current period.
From the above therefore, the period cost is the cost of items used up in this period but paid for in the next one.
The land purchased might look like the obvious choice but it is not because Assets are capitalised and not expensed.
I believe that statement is false
It's the other way around. Since sports able to attract the interest of large number of people, it attract interest of many organizations that feel that they can financially benefited from the audiences. Which is why you would constantly see massive advertisements displayed on the sports field or on the players' jersey.
