<span>The major guideline Douglas violated was to make sure that his goals were ethically sound. By telling his classmates how to get free food instead of showing them actual and legal ways to get deals, Douglas was presenting unethical means of consumerism, which showed that his goals were unethical and therefore a violation of a major guideline.</span>
Answer:
a) A scientific hypothesis that leaves fewer facts unexplained is just as adequate as a hypothesis that leaves more facts unexplained. <em>(FALSE)</em>
b) A fully adequate hypothesis addresses all open questions about the phenomenon it is intended to explain. <em>(TRUE)</em>
c) An adequate scientific hypothesis should account for most, but not all, of the facts it is intended to explain. <em>(FALSE)</em>
d) An adequate scientific hypothesis can serve to disprove prior hypotheses that were thought to be adequate. <em>(TRUE)</em>
Explanation:
The Romans considered it as an act of loyalty
Synopsis. Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England was a hugely influential treatise on English law that methodically rendered that massive body of statutes and legal decisions called the “common law” into a coherent system of legal principles intelligible to the lay-person.
Hopefully that helps you out ❤️
