Answer:
1.It Doesn’t Account for Discouraged Workers
2. It Ignores Other Marginally Attached Workers
3. It Doesn’t Separate Part-Time and Full-Time Workers
4. It Doesn’t Consider Whether People Have Low-Paying Jobs
5. It Doesn’t Capture the Long-Term Unemployment Rate
Explanation:
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
There is widespread police corruption. ... In recent years, the war on drugs has centered on the border between Mexico and the United States.
Explanation:
<span>Factors such as not having the sufficient money to
afford the tuition and not having the necessary connections to get into the
institution. The former is explainable because tertiary education is really
costly and the latter is not knowing who to ask or get in touch when applying
for the institution.</span>
