Answer:
a CGI script
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the most likely problem on the server is a CGI script. In the context of information technology, a Common Gateway Interface (CGI) is an interface for web servers used to execute certain scripts or programs. Therefore there must be a problem with the CGI script since it is not being read correctly and causing the crash.
Answer: Liquidation value
Explanation:
The liquidation value is one of the type of physical assets of an organization and the business value, real estate firms, directories and the equipment are refers as the liquidation value that helps in evaluating the overall worth of the firm.
This organizational value is lower as compared to the market value and it has less time for selling the products in the open market.
According to the given question, the liquidation value is refers as the actual amount of the stockholder expected value value in the market. Therefore, Liquidation value is the correct answer.
Answer:
The correct answer is depository institutions.
Explanation:
We denominate Depository institution to financial entities that can legally receive and manage monetary deposits from costumers.
This institution serves as a way to keep a person's money securely, and thus achieve the physical security of the person who owns the money, since having a certain amount of money with himself can be dangerous.
A client will give his money to a depository institution, which also have several types of bank accounts, and when the client wishes, that money will be returned.
The depository Institution, while saving your money, can use it to make investments or to lend to other costumers.
Answer: The correct answer is B. Yes, because the State B driver's claim is a proper cross-claim and is within the court's supplemental jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because the State B driver can assert his tort claim against the State B manufacturer. The driver's claim is a proper crossclaim and this is because it arises from the same occurrence as with State A consumer's claim.
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
