All categories

3 years ago

Please help! thanks so much

Mathematics

1 answer:

Stels [109]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we can see that $\lim_{x \to 2} (f(x))= -1$ .

Thus, for the question, we can just plug -1 in:

$\lim_{x \to 2} (\frac{x}{f(x)+1})=\frac{(2)}{-1+1} =und.$

Saying undefined (or unbounded) will be correct.

However, note that as x approaches 2, the values of y decrease in order to get to -1. In other words, $f(x)$ will always be greater or equal to -1 (you can also see this from the graph). This means that as x approaches 2, f(x) will approach -.99 then -.999 then -.9999 until it reaches -1 and then go back up. What is important is that because of this, we can determine that:

$\lim_{x \to 2} (\frac{x}{f(x)+1})=\frac{(2)}{-1+1} = +\infty$

This is because for the denominator, the +1 will always be greater than the f(x). This makes this increase towards positive infinity. Note that limits want the values of the function as it approaches it, not at it.

You might be interested in

I need help please!!

mina [271]

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{ - 1}{5} \times \frac{4}{7}$

$\: \: \: \: \: \frac{ - 4}{35}$

$\frac{ - 1}{2} \times \frac{4}{5}$

$\frac{ - 2}{5}$

$\frac{ - 3}{2} \times \frac{7}{ - 10}$

$\frac{21}{20}$

$\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{7}{8}$

$\frac{7}{16}$

$\frac{ - 9}{5} \times \frac{1}{2}$

$\frac{ - 9}{10}$

$\frac{ - 32}{9} \times \frac{1}{3}$

$\frac{ - 32}{27}$

$\frac{ - 2}{1} \div \frac{ - 19}{5}$

$\: \: \: \: \: \: \frac{ - 2}{1} \times \frac{5}{ - 19}$

$\: \: \: \: \frac{ - 10}{19}$

$\frac{1}{9} \div \frac{ - 4}{3}$

$\frac{1}{9} \times \frac{3}{ - 4}$

$\frac{ - 1}{12}$

$\frac{13}{7} \div \frac{23}{4}$

$\frac{13}{7} \times \frac{4}{23}$

$\frac{52}{161}$

$\frac{ - 37}{10} \div \frac{9}{4}$

$\frac{ - 37}{10} \times \frac{4}{9}$

$\frac{ - 74}{45}$

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Triangle ABC is similar to Triangle DEF. What is the measure of angle DEF? Refer to image, please show work :)

Ne4ueva [31]

Remember, all the interior angles of a triangle equals 180.
So in triangle ABC, it already gives us two out of the three angles.

First, we add 52 and 36 and that gives us 88.

Now we subtract 88 from 180.

180 - 88 = 92

So that means that ∠ABC is 92°

Now we have to look at triangle DEF.
The equation says that triangle DEF is similar to triangle ABC.

Looking at the picture, triangle DEF is smaller and is flipped upside down.

So that means that ∠ABC ≈ ∠DEF

In similar triangles, the measurements of angles does NOT change. Just the side length.

So since ∠ABC = 92° that means that ∠DEF = 92°

4 0

3 years ago

Can anyone solve this for me????

sweet-ann [11.9K]

The old rate of pay is x and the new rate is y then we have:

y = 2x + 7

Y = 21

PART 1: 21 = 2x+7

Subtract 7 from each side:

14 = 2x

Divide both sides by 2:

X = 14 / 2

X = 7

PART 2: The internship pays $7 per hour.

7 0

3 years ago

Which ordered pair is a solution of y > 5x-2? (3,13) (1,5) (2,7) (4,4)

zysi [14]

lol

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

An urban planner is researching commute times in the San Francisco Bay Area to find out if commute times have increased. In whic

Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The urban planner collects travel times from a random sample of 125 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area. A traffic Study from last year claimed that the average commute time in the San Francisco Bay Area is 45 min. The urban planner will see if there is evidence the average commute time is greater than 45 minutes

( Here in this case, Null hypothesis will be Η :μ = 45

And the Alternate Hypoyhesis will be H, :μ> 45 )

C. The urban planner asks a random Sample of 100 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area to record travel times on a Tuesday morning. One year later, the urban planner asks the same 100 commuters to record travel times on a tuesday morning . The urban planner will see the difference in commute time shows an increase.

Here in this case the null hypothesis will be, H₀ : $\mu _d$ = 0

And the Alternate Hypothesis will be H, : $\mu _d$ <0 The commute time after 1 year is more

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help! thanks so much​

Please help! thanks so much