The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>Brian has some understanding of budgeting. However, a budget does not create more money each month. It just helps him use his money better." That is the best answer among the choices.</span>
Answer:
Corporate Bonds and T-Bills will have return above 8%
Explanation:
given data
investments = 4
investment = 8 %
solution
first of all we get 95% confidence interval that is as
and here investment returns and standard deviation are attach so
95% confidence interval = Return - 2 × SD to Return + 2 × SD ................a
so here
we can see here as per table attach
here only Corporate Bonds and T-Bills will have return above 8%
Cracking the Sales Management Code: The Secrets to Measuring and Managing Sales Performance is a Book by Jason Jordan and Michelle Vazzana.
Explanation:
The cracking of the Sales Management Code addresses the realistic aspects of sales management in the new era and fills a gap. "Cracking the Sales Management Code fills this hole by providing basic information about the functioning of the sales force.
Improve sales by nullifying metrics which are relevant most, "sales may be an art, but sales management is a science. Crashing the Sales Management Code exposes research and offers practical steps to recognize benchmarks needed to succeed."
Answer:
1. As the RR, you should start acquiring all of the information needed to open the account from each joint owner.
2. Prior to purchasing the desired mutual fund, you should sit down with both joint owners and discuss the various risks associated with the investment.
Explanation:
In this situation, the RR must get all the relevant and important information that concerns opening the account and should also tell them the risks involved investing in such fund.
The RR should not just refuse to open the account because of risk he is not responsible for discussing what it means to open a JTWROS account.
Instead The RR has it as a duty to explain the implications of the JTWROS account to the client and her boyfriend
<span>25 years: No Payment, but total is 250000
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1/2 year later is P(1+0.03)
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1 year later is P(1+0.03)^2
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1½ years later is P(1+0.03)^3
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 2 years later is P(1+0.03)^4
</span><span>We need to recognize these patterns. Similarly, we can identify the accumulated value of all 50 payments of "P". Starting from the last payment normally is most clear.
</span>
<span>P(1.03) + P(1.03)^2 + P(1.03)^3 + ... + P(1.03)^50
That needs to make sense. After that, it's an algebra problem.
P[(1.03) + (1.03)^2 + (1.03)^3 + ... + (1.03)^50]
</span>
P(<span><span>1.03−<span>1.03^51)/(</span></span><span>1−1.03) </span></span>= <span>250000</span>
