1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serious [3.7K]
3 years ago
15

The standards of proof in a civil case is “beyond reasonable doubt” true or false

Law
1 answer:
laiz [17]3 years ago
8 0
In criminal cases, the government's proof must be more powerful than that. It must be beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves you firmly convinced of the defendant's guilt.
You might be interested in
What types of accomplishments make some prisedents better than others?
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

- Being more social or extroverted so they can share their thoughts or make speeches to the public

- Achievements like success in the past or if they have been something important in the past and made a big impact

- Willing to achieve their goals and don't give up and are confident they can succeed

- Experience like if they had an important role in the past that could prove how they could act

- Able to manage any type of a crisis that could happen (Possibly)

- Not being afraid to speak for what they believe in although other people may think their ideas are silly, not useful, or not wise

Hope this Helps

7 0
3 years ago
The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by which amendment?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer: The sixth amendment

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following can be a consequence of noncompliance with EEOC
adelina 88 [10]
I guess it will be c.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Korvikt [17]

In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.

But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.

Here’s what the law now says:

SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.

SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Porque los pecados nos alejan de Dios?
NISA [10]
Sí, verdad porque los pecados son malos y a Dios no le gusta cuando pecamos. que tengas un buen día que Dios los bendiga.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it legal for a public school to ban books under the First Amendment? In other words, since public schools are run by the gove
    6·1 answer
  • How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened betwee
    14·1 answer
  • Jessa wants to sell her product to a skeptical customer, so she claims it will last forever, even
    6·1 answer
  • Who can a bill come from
    13·2 answers
  • Which power does the president have as chief executive?
    7·2 answers
  • What is freedom? and are there any limits for freedom? (please include examples)<br><br> tysm!!! :)
    10·2 answers
  • Can a school official search a student's locker with only reasonable suspicion?<br><br> Yes<br> No
    13·2 answers
  • In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish
    6·1 answer
  • What federal powers are restricting Oregon from transporting marijuana to Nevada?
    12·1 answer
  • Look at the graphic of the three branches of government. Explain to a sixth grade student what these three branches did for the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!