1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
3 years ago
6

What was john gottman’s unexpected conclusion in conducting his longitudinal study?

Social Studies
1 answer:
omeli [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In 1992, Dr. Gottman and two of his colleagues, Kim Buehlman and Lynn Katz, conducted a clinical research study which astonished the world of relationship psychology. Interviewing 52 heterosexual, married couples about the history of their relationships allowed the researchers to predict which couples would separate or stay together three years later with over 94% accuracy. So, how were they able to do this?

The Research Study

In the interviews, the couples described their first meetings, courtship, decision to get married, the good and bad times, their philosophy of what makes marriage work, and the way that their marriage has changed over the years. Afterwards, they made a brief visit to the Love Lab, to have a 15-minute discussion about an area of conflict in their marriage, so that the researchers could see an example of the couple’s conflict style.

The researchers focused on a particular a set of seven variables in this study, to determine which were predictive of the success or failure of the relationships they observed. These variables were:

Affection toward the spouse.

Negativity toward the spouse.

Expansiveness, or how expressive each partner was during the interview.

“We-ness” versus separateness, or how much the spouses saw themselves as part of a team as opposed to emphasizing their independence.

Gender stereotypes, or how much like “traditional” men and women the spouses were in their emotional expressions and responses.

Volatility, or intensity of their feelings toward each other when dealing with conflict (Chaos or Glorifying the Struggle).

Marital disappointment and disillusionment.

The Results

Some of the variables that increased likelihood of a couple staying together included:

One spouse’s expression of fondness towards their partner

Both partners’ expression of “we-ness”

Expression of positivity or happiness in their marriage (especially on the part of the husband in heterosexual relationships)

In addition, here are some of the other factors that predicted a couple’s chances of success:

Marital Disappointment

The single most powerful predictor of divorce in this study was the partner’s disappointment with the marriage. This predictor was significantly correlated with both partners’ marital unhappiness, the spouse’s belligerence towards their partner, and their partner’s contempt and anger towards them. The partner’s disappointment in the marriage was also correlated to their partner’s faster heart rate during the marital interaction (increasing the likelihood of flooding).

Dealing with Conflict

Couples who score high in the Chaos dimension may end up divorcing because of their approach to the continual unforeseen circumstances they find themselves in. Couples who score high on this dimension feel out of control of external events and usually do not know how to problem solve or get back on their feet. Instead, they just accept that life is hard and they continue to struggle to survive instead of growing closer or learning new ways to deal with life’s problems. Unfortunately, the philosophy of passive endurance does not help their marriage survive.

On the other hand, couples who Glorify the Struggle have a better chance at staying together than couples who do not. These couples may be in the same turmoil as the couples who score high in chaos, but the difference is their perception of the hardships. Quotes like, “Marriage is the hardest job in the world, but it is well worth it,” demonstrate the couples’ feelings of hopefulness and togetherness (“we-ness” in Gottman-speak). Glorifiers go on to tell in detail how certain traumas and intense experiences made them feel closer to one another. Hence marriages with this outlook on hardships grow stronger and get better as time goes on. Glorifying the Struggle correlates negatively with divorce because hope and commitment towards the other is stressed.

<h2>This is a lot to think about. Luckily, you don’t have to slog through a slew of research studies in order to learn how to strengthen your own relationship! Our work at The Gottman Institute allows us to share the conclusions that Dr. Gottman has reached — so that we can give you the tools to create and maintain healthy, happy, and long-lasting relationships with your loved ones!</h2>

You might be interested in
Use the information to answer the question.
Evgesh-ka [11]

The correct answer is C) Columbian Exchange and Triangular Trade.

The two events that caused this culture found in Latin America were the Columbian Exchange and Triangular Trade.

It is correct to say that the inhabitants of Lima, Peru consists of Spaniards, Natives, Mestizos, and other casts, which is a result of the mixture of all three.

Let's have in mind that due to the Columbian exchange, thousands of white Europeans came to Mesoamerica (what today is México), the Caribbean Islands, and South America. After Spanish colonization, this vast region was known as New Spain. So Spaniards married Native Indians and Mestizos were born.

During the Columbian Exchange and Triangular Trade, people were transported to the Americas, there was continuing trade, and also Europeans brought many diseases to teh Americas that almost wipe out the entire population of Native Indians. Diseases such as chickenpox, smallpox, malaria, cholera, or influenza.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the immediate goal of the Albany Movement?
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

The Albany Movement aimed to end all forms of racial segregation in the city, focusing initially on desegregating travel facilities, forming a permanent biracial committee to discuss further desegregation, and the release of those jailed in segregation protests.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Uhhh I dont understand this lol....
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

I think it's showing how the Monroe Doctrine was about how "the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers" and that it wouldn't interfere with existing colonies. The picture kind of shows how the two sides are split and not interfering with each other.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Which country sent james cook to the west coast of north america
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

Spanish

Explanation:

In sailing north to the coast of America, the expedition was sailing towards seas which were already being explored by other European nations. The Spanish claimed ownership of the west coast and, to buttress their claim, had sent an expedition to the North Pacific in 1774. Glad I could help!

3 0
3 years ago
In A Treatise of Human Nature, Hume says the following: "Tis not unreasonable for me to prefer the destruction of the whole worl
Tomtit [17]

Answer and Explanation

Hume clamis in that passage, and this is the essentials of his theory, that ethics and morals are not determine by reason. That is why it is no unreasonable to think of one self when reason is in charge. There for selfish thoughts as the destruction fo the whole world are effects of reason, that is why he calls them not unreasonable.

Hume claims that for a person to acts according to ethics and morality, sentiments or afections must be placed. The point he wants to make is not about justifying selfish acts, but to point out how humans and their reasoning can be destructive. And to underline the importants of other matters in human life such as afection and feelings.

Hume undermine objectivity in ethics because objectivity comes from thinking and reasoning, which as we already explained is not ethical. To act in a moral and ethical way, is to think about the consequences of every action, and also to consider others.

To have an ethical thinking is very important for society, the impact our actions have is necessary.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is paid equally by employer and employee? A. Workers' compensation B. Federal income tax C. Unemployment
    13·1 answer
  • When college students were asked which personal characteristics they found to be the most positive and most negative in a friend
    15·1 answer
  • Plz help me asap and dont make it more then 4 sentences or my teacher will know it was not me
    11·1 answer
  • Where in the constitution is the ratification power described
    6·1 answer
  • Gisela is suffering from a condition that involves thickening of the lens of her eyes. this causes her vision to become cloudy o
    5·1 answer
  • Why do sociologists need to be careful when drawing conclusions from twin studies?
    15·1 answer
  • Plz answer this i really need to pass and no links or anything or ill report
    5·1 answer
  • How much energy is available at trophic level 3 if the producers start with 45000 kcal of energy
    12·1 answer
  • Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that attempts to help people __________. A. Reveal personal needs and wishes B. Successfully
    9·1 answer
  • IM TIMED WILL GIVE BRAINLEST!!!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!