Well you have an empty seat and she is walking to your table I predict she will sit there.
It is = c deeedjdjdjfjfjfhfhbdkd
Hello. You forgot the answer options. The options are:
A. To force the radio station to fire Welles and his producers
B. To make Orson Welles feel bad for having caused a panic
C. To generate interest and sell newspapers
D. To allow readers a chance to feel better about their reaction
Answer:
C. To generate interest and sell newspapers
Explanation:
The Newyork Times knew of the interest that the population used to have in stories of hysteria, stories that caused a negative movement in the population through manipulation and an intense procological control, capable and causing panic in many people at once. In this case, Newyork Times decided to emphasize the stories of mass hysteria, because it knew that this would promote a great sale of newspapers, because it had a large interested public.
Answer:
c). No, because a flood has no intention.
Explanation:
As per the question, no, the given quotation doesn't signify that floods are appalling or evil as they don't come with a specific purpose or goal of destroying lives or properties. The idea that the author wishes to convey is the significance of relativism and free will or liberty in life.
Zhuang Zi highlights that an individual should uproot himself from the compelling ideas of 'reputation or success' that the political, as well as, social order teaches him and detach himself from all the fears, threats, or oppression and <u>leave his spirit free of all these restrictions</u>. This is why he says that 'objective existences don't harm' if your spirit is liberated from such orders and self-constructed in itself. Thus, <u>option c</u> is the correct answer.
FEWFB WMRFB NEMF WEKFNBWEFHKJKE FEKHFBEWKW
