Answer: Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment.
Explanation:
From the given options, we can state that the following statement is false i.e. Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment. Our choices as a consumer tends to have a huge impact on our surroundings especially the larger social environment. Our choice affect the forces of supply and demand , and thus everything related to it.
Answer:
Microeconomics
Explanation:
Microeconomics is the study of decisions made by people and businesses regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. It also takes into account taxes, regulations, and government legislation.
Microeconomics main focus is on the supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels in the economy. Microeconomics main purpose is to understand human choices, decisions, and the allocation of resources
Answer:
Epistemic shopping
Explanation:
Epistemic shopping is the type of shopping activity when the customer visits various places, and tries several presentations of the same product, in order to gain information or knowledge about the product, in order to pruchase only the best alternative later on.
Jim is engaging in epistemic shopping because he is very active in visiting cheese stores, trying out new cheeses, but he hardly ever purchases anything. This is because the main motivation behind his shopping activity is to gain knowledge, not to engage in compulsive shopping.
An enlightment thinker who believed in humans having natural rights.
Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
