Answer:
e) None of the above specific torts occurred
Explanation:
<u>Katrina herself didn't commit anything in this specific situation. She only threatened Kyla so far that we know, and Kyla did possibly commit theft, but the question and the answer choices to not refer to anything that happened in the given situation. </u>
Maybe in the scene that is continuing, Katrina is the accomplice of the assault that happened on Kyla, but we don't know that. From the specific situation, we can not see that any of the mentioned torts happened.
Answer:constitutional law
Explanation:
The freedom of speech is in the constitution
Mark me brainliest plz
The New England area (Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire) was known for flat land near to the coast and hilly and mountainous away from the coastline. The soil of this area was rocky which made farming extremely difficult. New England colonies were not known for farming, but instead for using its coast for fishing, logging, whaling, trapping, and shipbuilding.
The Southern Colonies (Maryland, Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina) contains a wide range of physical geography that includes coastal plains (flat), mountains, and piedmont (gentle mountain slope). The soil was ideal for farming and crop cultivation with an extended growing season thanks to warmer climates. The Southern Colonies depended on farming for their economy. Farming included rice, tobacco, cotton, and indigo plants in which slaves and indentured servants were often caregivers for the crops.
Answer:
Nepal, officially the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal, is a landlocked country in South Asia. It is mainly situated in the Himalayas, but also includes parts of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, bordering .
Answer:Covariation Model
Explanation:
Covariation Model is an attribution that considers our explanation of other people behavior based on social perception and self percetions.
These are intended that we make about others behavior and our own
When we want to explain the behavior of others we focus on similarities (covariation)
There are three particular types of information we consider to make our attribution
Consensus: we consider how similar the reaction of others to the same stimulus
Distinctiveness: how similar is the diffrent reaction to the same stimulus
Consistency: how often the same stimulus and response in the same situation are perceived.
Internal attribution are a result of a low consensus and distinctiveness with high consistency.
External attribution result when all these aspects are high
