Answer:
Evidence of the latter would since have been covered by a sea-level rise of more than a hundred meters following the end of the last glacial period. Archaeologists contend that Paleo-Indians migrated out of Beringia ( western Alaska ), between c. 40,000 and c. 16,500 years ago. This time range remains a source of substantial debate.
Explanation:
was it helpful
The type of view which states that development is the result of an ongoing, bidirectional interchange between heredity and the environment is:
<h3>What is Epigenetic View?</h3>
This refers to the school of thought which believes that for an individual to develop, then he needs to have interactional exchange between nature and nurture.
With this in mind, we can state that it is the epigenetic view which the question is talking about because of the interaction between the environment and heredity for development to occur.
Read more development here:
brainly.com/question/11352260
Answer:
The President of the European Parliament (Martin Schulz) stated that it must be a precondition for Turkey to recognise the systematic massacres of Armenians in 1915 as genocide. The government of Turkey rejects such a precondition for EU membership and does not accept it as a part of the EU membership criteria.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
