Answer/Explanation:
The logical fallacy presented is an ad hominem. The statement tries to prove that voting yes on stadium tax will make you a good person. Those of the opposing argument would have been "unloyal" citizens. This argument proves feelings rather than facts making it an ad hominem.
The phrase, "Voting on the stadium tax is the duty of every loyal citizen" is a true statement. However, adding voting "yes," specifies it to one side. The author then takes it a step further stating "in fact, it is the test of whether you are a good neighbor." In the long run, this implies that if you vote against us, you are a bad person.
After reading excerpt represented above I can clearly see the right answer from the scale attached above. Definitely, this paragraph uses standart compare-contrast organization, so now it is clear that the only correct option is the first one A. Comparison and contrast; cause and effect. Especially such words<span> as "however" and "on the other hand" are the prompts for you to understand why I think so.</span>
Answer:
<em>Additionally, conservationists urge government officials to enforce the use of TEDs and increase monitoring to ensure compliance.</em>
Explanation:
The sentence that suggests that not all required individuals cooperate with laws regarding the use of TEDs is the third one: <em>Additionally, conservationists urge government officials to enforce the use of TEDs and increase monitoring to ensure compliance. </em>
The abbreviation TED stands for <em>Turtle Excluder Device</em>, which allows a sea turtle caught in a fisherman's net to escape. As some species of sea turtles are endangered, it's important for people to respect certain guidelines regarding their conservation, including the use of TEDs. If everyone followed these laws, conservationists wouldn't have to urge the government to increase monitoring. If there is a need for monitoring, there are individuals who break them.
Answer:
whyyyy
thx for the free points tho
Explanation: