No, the charge would be aggravated Assult because it was with a weapon his attorney could try to use temporary insanity but there’s a high chance that wouldn’t succeed
It doesn’t have any picture attached
1. It is a symbol of freedom
2. It is the right to be legally justified or safe
3. It allows people to be protected from danger or suspicious situations and people
4. it provides documentation long-term on serious issues
Please Vote my answer brainliest! Thanks.
The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
Article one courts are tribunals created by the Congress to handle specialized types of cases, especially those that rise under the regulatory law of federal agencies. The decisions of Article one courts are generally reviewable in Article three courts.
Explanation:quizlet
