Answer:
Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.
AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.
Answer: Allowing a child to interpret in an emergency.
Explanation: I found the answer on Quizlet. :)
42-46% according to ncbi.nih.gov
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
ANSWER: I believe your answer would be B as I have droven before and in intersections where I drive its common curtesy and just obvious you cant change lanes in the MIDDLE of an intersection when you are cross, if anyone has any other questions, answer em'.
