The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called <u>jurisprudence</u><u>.</u> It is the concept that differentiates public from private law.
What holds true about jurisprudence?
Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law. Several theories that assist explain the beginnings of law and its justification have evolved over the years. These legal theories (or philosophies) are referred to as jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law.
Positive law jurisprudence:
It thinks that law is only the state's orders enforced through force. Proper law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought.
Learn more about jurisprudence here:
brainly.com/question/14612573
#SPJ4
For statement 1. It is a positive to an extent. Stop sighs can often be covered in graffiti, which can began to cost more and more every time you repaint them. For statement 2 and 3. Traffic signals would cause less accidents because of the fact that they “force” you to stop, they give every car a chance to go, and give pedestrians the right of way to walk as well.
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
<em>Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.</em>
