1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vagabundo [1.1K]
3 years ago
10

4. High-risk drivers habitually deviate from driving norms. T or F Need help please

Law
1 answer:
love history [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

i really hope this helps:)

You might be interested in
How do future consequences influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?​
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

people choose to work desk jobs that do not keep them fit, and now they have to make more time to stay healthy. things like land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship that are needed to produce goods and services.

Explanation:

hope this helps please brainiest

8 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.
Tanya [424]

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.  Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
A couple alter the number on a lottery ticket to match the previous night's winning
Crank
Counterfeiting or forgery
3 0
3 years ago
_____________________ is a legal concept that means people can be held responsible for their actions even when they didn’t inten
natulia [17]

Answer: Strict liability

Explanation:

 Strict liability basically responsible for holding the someone liable for the damages and loss without any mistake. Basically , it is the legal concept which the person are responsible for their consequences and action.

It is also known as absolute liability that basically caused by the damages and the defective products. The strict liability are basically reorganize as criminal law and possession crime is one of the example of the strict liability.  

7 0
3 years ago
Select Yes if the item describes a society that functions under the rule of law.
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I don't think I have any explanation

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The English Bill of Rights of 1689 states, “That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, withou
    15·2 answers
  • When a company goes public, it begins doing what?
    13·1 answer
  • Question 8 (10 points)
    13·1 answer
  • Discuss FOUR (4) disadvantages of trade credit to the<br> buyer
    11·1 answer
  • How does criminal justice system deals with vulnerable groups such as lesbains, gay, bisexual? in 200 words ​
    14·1 answer
  • A standard serving of alcohol can be compared to ...
    14·2 answers
  • If there was a robbery 4 weeks ago and the body was found yesterday, and the police just noticed. Who’s to blame for the crime??
    12·2 answers
  • How has the confirmation power change reflected<br> political trends in American government?
    5·1 answer
  • What does objection mean
    15·1 answer
  • Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!