1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
never [62]
3 years ago
7

What evidence suggests that the U.S. Army was a "great educator" during its efforts to prepare soldiers to fight in World War I?

History
1 answer:
taurus [48]3 years ago
5 0

Before the United States entered the war, Nazi Germany Minister of Propaganda, Josef Goebbels, expressed his confidence and optimism in the eventual possibility of the U.S. joining the Allied side against Germany because the regular U.S. armed forces were too small and poorly equipped as to pose a threat to Hitler's Germany. As well, he laughed at the U.S. government plans to increase the number of servicemen by recruiting and training common citizens in order to create a "citizen army," a term Goebbels found preposterous and laughable. Likewise, Nazi Germany Minister of the Air Force (Luftwaffe), Hermann Göring, publicly stated that "Americans are only good at manufacturing refrigerators and razor blades."

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, millions of U.S. civilians, many young men ages 17 to 21, showed up at the recruiting offices to join the armed forces and avenge the sailors and soldiers killed in Pearl Harbor.  Throughout the course of the war, the U.S. Army alone elected and trained six million men and through relatively brief yet pretty practical and effective training programs such as the basic training program (where men learned the basics of military life and basic use of firearms) and  basic combat training for infantrymen, and the training officer program (usually taken by college students selected by the Army) that officer candidates would take at the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC).

By July 1942, the U.S. Army had managed to complete the training for the first combat-ready units that would serve as of August 1942 in the Pacific Theater of Operations (PTO) in Guadalcanal and New Guinea. The following batch of fully-trained and operational combat units would have the baptism of fire in November 1942 as U.S. troops landed in Casablanca, Morocco. As the U.S. G.I.s (<em>government issue, </em>nickname given to U.S. Army soldiers) first engaged in combat, they struggled to hold their own ground as their enemies were seasoned and experience in combat after years of war; however, the skills and knowledge acquired in basic training and a combat training proved valuable to help inexperienced G.I.s to quickly learn the latest warfare tips from their British allies plus they would also learn directly from their clashes with the Germans, Italians and Japanese.

In conclusion, the U.S. Army wartime training programs proved to be successful in turning citizens into combat-ready soldiers with skills that would serve them well even after the war. Furthermore, president Roosevelt issued the G.I. Bill which granted college scholarships to many World War II veterans and greatly increased the educational levels of the U.S. population in the years to come.

You might be interested in
Arguing against the nativist position in 1852, a massachusetts senator argued that the __________.
Pachacha [2.7K]
The Irish were inferior and therefore they lift up everyone else, hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements does not describe a result of the cotton
matrenka [14]
It would be that "<span>(E) Greater pressure was exerted on removing Native Americans from the </span><span>South" that was not a result of the cotton gin, since most of the Natives were already in the west at this time. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
The Mexican government depended on _______ to make money.
Ronch [10]

Answer: A. Raging War

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which geographical feature helped Rome to develop trade routes with other regions?
Sati [7]
The mediterranean sea
6 0
2 years ago
What is TRUE about the debate between nurture versus nature? Both environment and heredity are important in determining psycholo
never [62]

Answer:

Try B

A person's environment is the most important factor in determining psychological traits

Explanation:

(1) I just finished taking sociology myself.

(2) This was from a previous answer on a test question that i got correct

Hope this helps Beloved

Question 100

1 out of 1 points

Correct In the nature versus nurture debate, sociologists claim that ....

Selected Answer:

d.nurture is far more important than nature.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What compromise did Congress reach in establishing a court system?
    5·2 answers
  • The author directly uses all of the following pieces of evidence to support his argument about the relationship between exotic g
    15·1 answer
  • Where was the Battle of the Bulge?
    7·1 answer
  • From 2000 to 2012 the U.S. had a trade
    7·1 answer
  • Does Christopher Columbus have a political career
    12·1 answer
  • How is the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment best described?
    13·1 answer
  • Help me please big help
    14·1 answer
  • Which option is the best example of a research method historians use to study the past?
    9·1 answer
  • Answer #16 I give brainliest to whoever replies first or the best reply
    15·1 answer
  • Which was the initial strategy of the North?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!