A scientific argument is when it had more examples of that certain argument. What I’m saying is that scientific arguments have more details and more evidence to why that answer is wrong or right. Regular arguments is when it is less detailed and just making predictions and theoretical analysis. (Hope this helps)
The main reason why the Allies agreeh to fight until the Axis Powers surrendered unconditionally, which possibly prolonged the war, is because anything short of an unconditional surrender would leave room for the Axis to re-mobilize.
<span>Socialists and anarchists</span>
Answer:
the federal government could declare a state law illegal if it went against the Constitution
Explanation:
People saying racist things to each other or wars that move a group of people because of their race for example like the nazi party hitler didn't like jewish people.
