Answer:
The core of the tradition holds that in 458 Cincinnatus was appointed dictator of Rome in order to rescue a consular army that was surrounded by the Aequi on Mount Algidus. At the time of his appointment he was working a small farm. He is said to have defeated the enemy in a single day and celebrated a triumph in Rome.
I can’t see any possible options but secondary sources and online sources should be double checked and avoided if possible. few secondary sources are trustworthy like textbooks
Answer:
Hannibal made one major tactical error: He did not attack and capture Rome when he had the opportunity.
Hannibal conducted his operations in Italy not as one campaign in a larger war but as the only campaign in the only war. He seemed to hold to the conviction that if he won enough battles, he would win Italy. And if he won Italy, victory over the Roman people would be his. Battles are the means to a strategic end, not ends in themselves. Hannibal was a sworn enemy of the Romans and he let his emotions cloud out that fact when he launched the second Punic War. He could win every battle, but he did not apply those battles to wining the war.
There seemed to be some confusion between tactics and strategy in his mind. This caused him to commit a number of operational failures that led to his eventual defeat in Romes heartland.
The Carthaginian senate had failed to send him critical supplies and troops when most needed. He had severe logistical problems. Tactics win battles, logistics win wars. There was no good reason why supply transports could not have gotten through to Hannibal.
Moronically, Carthage’s strategic shift away from Italy after Cannae came at a time when Hannibal’s momentum was at its full. Cannae was an absolutely devastating defeat for the Romans. Politics.
Hannibal was eventually called back to Carthage because of the military failures of his compatriots. The Romans had pushed into Carthaginian territory, and they needed reinforcements.
Explanation:
<span>He promised to approach
American Foreign Policy by applying basic human rights. He planned to impart a
new morality in American diplomacy, one grounded in the pursuit of human
rights. The Carter administration thus spoken, planned, and applied a
human rights strategy that would serve as the foundation of Carter’s foreign
policy. The administration also related human rights concerns directly to the
conduct of foreign policy, together with a support for a bill halting
importation of Rhodesian (Zimbabwe) chrome and the lessening of foreign aid to
other nations that did not display adequate respect for human rights.</span>
