1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnom [1K]
3 years ago
9

If the u.S. President is suspected of certain treasonous acts or other "high crimes", the House of Representatives may choose to

indict them Or do which of the selections below to them
Law
1 answer:
babunello [35]3 years ago
8 0

<u>Charges taken over if the US president is suspected of certain treasonous acts or other high crimes:</u>

Legislature can charge against a civil officer for crimes said to have been committed bribery, treason or other high crimes. It does not mean removal from office; it is only a statement of charges, similar to indictment in criminal law.

Two presidents, Bill Clinton, and Andrew Johnson were impeached, but the Senate voted not to convict any of them. After the Judiciary Committee approved 3 articles of impeachment Nixon resigned but before the House voted on them. Vice President takes over if a president is impeached.

In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the US or adhering to their Enemies, giving them comfort and aid. Conviction requires two witnesses or a confession in open court.

Impeachment is a 3 step procedure at the federal level. The following are the three steps,

Investigation by the Congress: Beginning in the House Judiciary Committee, but may begin elsewhere.

Voting by the House of Representatives: They have to pass, by a majority of those present and voting, the articles of impeachment, that constitute the formal allegations. Based on the passage, the defendant will be "impeached".

By the Senate: The Senate investigates the accused person. The Chief Justice of the US presides over the proceedings in the case of any impeachment of a president. The result of conviction is removal of the civil officer from office.

You might be interested in
Keeping in mind the constitutional war powers of Congress and the President, how would you assess the
Goryan [66]

Answer:

"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
if a Pesident is accuced of breaking the twenty second amendment, that means the president is trying to
Alchen [17]

Answer:

run for a third term.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do we have to follow the rules of the law
motikmotik

Answer:

Why cant we have chaos and be free like the animals in the wilderness..

Animals dont have laws in the animal kingdom

why should we..?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jurisdiction” is Select one: a. The extent to which a court can rule on the conduct of persons or the status of things. b. A cou
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

The extent to which a court can rule on the conduct of persons or the status of things

Explanation:

It is defined as the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.

"federal courts had no jurisdiction over the case"

synonyms: authority, control, power, dominion, rule, administration, command, sway, leadership, sovereignty, ascendancy, hegemony, mastery; More:

the extent of the power to make legal decisions and judgments.

"the claim will be within the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal"

a system of law courts; a judicature.

plural noun: jurisdictions

"in some jurisdictions there is a mandatory death sentence for murder"

8 0
2 years ago
Are conservatorships a thing in communist countries?
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

It is slightly a common thing, not completely.

<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • ⦁ _____________ _________________ is planning by the government. It is how the government lays out guidelines for itself to foll
    15·1 answer
  • When command is transferred, then all personal involved in the incident should be told
    8·1 answer
  • Aristotle and Rawls have opposing views about the relation between justice and moral desert. What best characterizes the differe
    6·1 answer
  • Why do we have money?
    8·2 answers
  • What are the recent trends in American juvenile justice, and how has this portion of the American criminal justice system improv
    7·1 answer
  • What generalization can you make about these five presidential elections?
    11·1 answer
  • Are YOU persuaded by Justice Frankfurter's argument that the determination of the content of due process is an "objective" rathe
    6·1 answer
  • According to Prakash, why must some people wait months to diagnose why they are sick? What does the traditional microscope have
    7·2 answers
  • What are the rule of law​
    10·1 answer
  • How many amendments are there in the bill of rights?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!