1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
2 years ago
6

How did the Banking Act of 1933 make banks more stable in the long run?

History
2 answers:
miss Akunina [59]2 years ago
5 0

it's atleast It separated commercial and investment banking.

out of all choices

olga55 [171]2 years ago
4 0

The answer is: It separated commercial and investment banking.

The Banking Act of 1933 was a banking reform that was enacted upon the failure of said banks during the great depression. This act <u>prevented commercial banks to invest in a business</u> and enacted more strict regulations.

You might be interested in
What was one of the antifederalits strongest arguments against the constitution
Illusion [34]
That the constitution gave too much power to the federal government. Anti-federalist wanted individual states to have power over the government due to fear of a tyranical government
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how the Framers of the Constitution divided American government to create a democracy. a) Describe and give examples of
Artist 52 [7]
T<span>he Framers of the Constitution divided American government into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This created a better democracy because the power is not concentrated within one branch or in the hands of a few. 

The systems in </span><span>place that protect against one branch having too much power is called "separation of powers" and "checks and balances." This system keeps each branch from getting too powerful by limiting its powers. For example, the legislative branch can pass a law but the president veto it. That's a way the executive branch checks the legislative. And let's say the legislature really wants to pass that law, so they vote on it. With 2/3 majority of votes for the law, Congress can override the president's veto. That's a way the legislative branch checks on the executive. And let's say that although that law was passed by the legislature, some say that it's unconstitutional. If that happens, then the judicial branch checks out the law and can declare it unconstitutional. If it's declared unconstitutional, then the law will be no longer enforced or valid. That's a way the judicial branch checks the other branches. 

Other examples of "checks and balances" is how the president is in charge of the armed forces, but only Congress can declare war. The judicial branch interprets laws and their constitutionality, but the president appoint the federal judges. The president appoints the federal judges, but the legislative branch has to approve those officials. The legislative branch also decides how many judges would be in the Supreme Court. The president can veto and the judicial can repeal laws, but the legislature can impeach the president and federal judges/officials. 

These systems are important to American democracy because they keep the government from getting too powerful and oppressing the people. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the land claims in North America prior to the French and Indian War that would eventually lead to
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

Prior to the French and Indian War, the American Colonists wanted to extend their territory to the west of the Appalachian Mountains, in what is now the Midwest.

The British Crown opposed this because they did not want to have conflicts with the Native Americans in these lands, and with the French.

In the end, the conflict became impossible to avoid, and the British won, and the land was granted to the Empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Which football club?s ground was used as a prisoner of war camp until May 1945 during the second World War?
Nonamiya [84]
<span><span>Which football club's ground is Swindon Town </span>
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Tyler, Dusty, and Matt own all shares of stock in Abels​ Enterprises, and shares of stock are not offered to the general public.
kobusy [5.1K]

Abels Enterprises is likely a closely held corporation because shares of stock are not offered to the general public.

Since Abels Enterprises is a closely held corporation, it has a limited number of stockholders and its stocks are rarely exchanged.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. How can the Preamble be used to evaluate how the federal government is doing its<br> job?
    14·2 answers
  • What game was played during the truce?
    7·2 answers
  • According to the information in the chart, citizenship would be granted to a child
    9·1 answer
  • HELP ME PLZ i really need help
    12·2 answers
  • What is the name for the branch of the French Army created for foreign recruits?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following may be a reason why
    13·2 answers
  • Great Britain experienced stability partly because it
    13·1 answer
  • What contributed to the growth of Hinduism? Select all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • What is this called please help!!! I’ll mark brainlist ;)
    10·1 answer
  • After the disappointment of the third crusade, western forces would never again threaten the real basis of Muslim power. From th
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!