Answer:
1. Doctor : You should take this medicine every day.
Patient : Should I take it before dinner or after dinner?
Doctor : No, you should take it after breakfast.
The Doctor advised the patient that (a) he should take the medicine every day. The patient further asked (b) if he should take it before or after dinner.The doctor replied negatively and then said (c) that he should take it after breakfast.
2. Teacher : Children, let us all pledge to save trees.
Children : Yes, Mam, we all pledge to save our trees as the trees are the lungs of the city.
Teacher : Let us start today by planting a sapling.
The teacher asked all the children to pledge to save trees. The children replied affirmatively (a) that they pledge to save their trees as the (b) lungs of the city. Then the teacher said that (c)they would start by planting a sapling.
The engine of the story is the narrator's insistence, not on his innocence (which would be normal) but on his sanity. But this reveals a self-destructive drive, since it is pretending to demonstrate sanity through guilt in crime. His denial of madness is based, above all, on the systematic nature of his homicidal behavior, on his precision and on the rational explanation of an irrational behavior. This rationality, however, is undermined by its lack of motivation - "There was no reason. There was no passion. »-. However, the murderer claims that the idea was hovering day and night in his head. Thus, the final scene is nothing more than the result of the character's guilt. Like many other characters in traditional macabre literature, passions dictate their nature. And despite all his efforts, evidently, the pretense of having heard the heart beat at a distance, despite his acute sensitivity, is the evidence of madness and insanity. Readers of the time surely felt very interested in the subject of the allegation of transient madness that recreates the story.
<span>- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- </span><span>Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view</span>- <span>Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute</span>- <span>Editors should treat each other with respect and civility</span>- <span>Wikipedia has no firm rules</span>
Hope this helps! :)
Umm, I'm kind of confused about the question, but I would assume that if, for example, I was taking an exam an pre-read the questions before answering, that I would be more prepared to answer, and therefore have a slightly better chance of getting the answer right...? I'm not really sure.
Answer: It ain’t right. Ain’t no man ought to eat his woman’s food year in and year out, and see his children running wild. Ain’t nothing right about that." The answer for this would be option C.
Explanation:
