Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement would be considered true as it asserts a true claim about J.S. Mill's 'principle of liberty' denying the conception of 'victimless crime'. He stated that individual actions should only be restricted when it is causing damage to others. He proclaimed that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". In simple terms, he stated that no one should be prevented from doing a specific action unless his/her actions are not invasive or harmful to the other's rights. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
Answer:
Informal reasoning
Explanation:
Informal reasoning refers to a form of reasoning that rely on general knowledge, personal thinking, and knowledge from other people in order to create a conclusion.
This type of reasoning is called 'informal' because it's not backed by proper/structured scientific research and can be heavily influenced by bias.
This can be seen in the example above. Making conclusion based on online reviews is heavily biased toward the personal preference of the reviewers.
Katrina was a major disaster and the contamination with the
unhealthy levels of formaldehyde did not help at all. Formaldehyde is a colorless gas that has a
quite strong smell and at a room temperature is not flammable but unfortunately
the smell is not the only problem as formaldehyde can cause severe health issues.
<span />
It is very difficult to imagine human existence without conflict. The world is full of conflict, because human beings tend to be conflictive.
Conflict is part of the structure of our bilateral or multilateral relations, that is, our social life.
Understanding the principle of nonviolence as well as the nature of the UN's action against the Gaddafi dictatorship first of all requires understanding the motivations (why) of conflict in our lives.
