Answer:
25 states
Explanation:
Hope this helps, and please mark me brainliest if it does!
Answer:
1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer. 3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.
5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.
Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.
Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.
brainliest plz
Answer:
Ruling Class Families in Rome
Answer:
<em>Miguel León-Portilla</em>, from book <em>The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico</em>
Explanation:
<em>The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico is indeed a book written by Miguel León-Portilla, which translates excerpts of Nahuatl-language accounts of the Aztec Empire's Spanish conquest.</em>
The Broken Spears review paper is constructed in three distinguishable parts: the first one is the general intro León-Portilla utilizes to include context for both the book's subject matter.
He explains the cultural heritage of Aztec amongst the Nahua nations, the importance of Nahuatl spoken translators, and the struggle of accounts written by eyewitnesses well after the Spanish conquest of Mexico.
Class is cRazy we all
Space out and all
