We have been given that Clare made $160 babysitting last summer. She put the money in a savings account that pays 3% interest per year. If Clare doesn't touch the money in her account, she can find the amount she'll have the next year by multiplying her current amount 1.03.
We are asked to write an expression for the amount of money Clare would have after 30 years if she never withdraws money from her account.
We will use exponential growth function to solve our given problem.
An exponential growth function is in form 
, where
y = Final value,
a = Initial value,
r = Growth rate in decimal form,
x = Time.
We can see that initial value is $160. Upon substituting our given values in above formula, we will get:
To find amount of money in Clare's account after 30 years, we need to substitute 
in our equation.
Therefore, the expression 
represents the amount of money that Clare would have after 30 years.
Take the area of the small photograph and divide it by four, assuming it's a square, each side would then be 6 inches. The large photograph has double the side length of the small one, so 6 multiplied by 2 is 12. To find the area of the large (square) photograph, multiply 12 by 12 as two of the sides, and the area of the large photo is 144 square inches
Answer:
5.1 cm
. . . . . .
All we have to do is convert our 51mm to centimeters.
We divide the length value by 10 to get our centimeters.
51 divided by 10 = 5.1
All we have to do is move our "invisible decimal"
In my way, every whole number has an invisible decimal at it's end.
For ex: '60.'
We can get into exponents. 10 is 10¹, any exponent is the number of zeros at the end of a number may have. Ex: '10² = 100'
We can move our decimal to the left since we are dividing. The amount of exponent numbers are the amount you move it, multiplying and dividing are different things with that.
Let's get back on topic.
Moving our decimal to the left with dividing is 5.1 since 10¹ has a "1" as it's exponent, making us move it "1" to the left.
Multiplying is going the right way.
I hope this helps.
The largest area would be a square with 125 ft of fencing on each side.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Option B. Standard error of predicted amount.
Step-by-step explanation:
A standard error predicted amount will work best in this scenario. The data, when extracted from the standard mean, provides the most accurate presentation of the statistical data on question. By using the standard error, the variation from the central point can be determined.
