Heather is a Hourly employee and Alicia is a full-time Salary employee.
<h3>What is
employee?</h3>
An employee is someone who works for someone else or a company in exchange for wages or other agreed-upon compensation. An employee is someone who works for McDonald's and is paid a certain amount of money for each hour worked.
Employees are paid to perform specific duties and tasks for their employers. They typically work full-time, part-time, or on a temporary basis. Employees carry out specific job responsibilities and roles, which are usually defined in the job description.
An employer is a person, company, or organization that hires people and pays them for their services. Employees are people who are paid to do work.
To know more about employee follow the link:
brainly.com/question/1190099
#SPJ4
Answer:
nothing nothing nothing nothing
Explanation:
nothing
A British grocery chain uses previously obtained U.S. dollars to purchase apples from the United States. This transaction increases British net capital outflow and increases U.S. net exports. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a grocery chain?</h3>
Generally, Fresh or packaged food is sold at grocery stores, which are sometimes known as "grocery shops" (AE), "grocery stores" (BE), or simply "grocery" (AE).
In conclusion, Apples from the U.S. are purchased by a British supermarket chain using U.S. money that was previously purchased. This deal raises net capital outflow from the United Kingdom and boosts net exports from the United States.
Read more about the grocery chain
brainly.com/question/7275127
#SPJ1
What ? Getting a good grade I guess or $20 for A+
Answer:
a.the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi
Explanation:
In the event where TP who sold a franchise to Choi decides to go out of business and transfers everything to a third. In a lawsuit the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi.
