Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others. 
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough. 
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that? 
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning. 
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong. 
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
The snow is deep on the ground.
       Always the light falls
       Softly down on the hair of my belovèd.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Based on the details in chapter 14, it can be inferred that Felix is a benevolent man who pursues justice.
<h3>What is the chapter 14 about?</h3>
This chapter focuses on the stories of the cottagers as the monster created by Frankenstein  has been learning about them. In this chapter, the monster decribes Felix coordinated the Safie's father scaped after this man was fasely accused and condemned to death.
<h3>What can be inferred about Felix?</h3>
It can be he is a very benevolent character who does not only care about Safie but about her family. Moreover, Felix is very eager to seek for justice. This is supported by details such as:
- "Felix had accidentally been present at the trial; his horror and indignation were uncontrollable when he heard the decision of the court"
Learn more about texts in: brainly.com/question/20393069
 
        
             
        
        
        
 Answer:
1. How does this paragraph support the article's overall purpose?
2. What details support this paragraph’s connections to its own topic?
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
The date was January 15, 1967
Hope this helps!