The correct option to the question is option B: Juries have a random selection from the general population
Juries have a random selection from the general population and this is a very important point to take into consideration. A jury is a group of citizens assigned a court case who will participate in the trial and reach a verdict. They will decide whether the defendant is guilty or not from committing a crime.
It's important that the members of the jury are selected at random so that any partiality can be prevented. Before each potential member of a jury is assigned a case, they go through a<u> process of selection</u>. During this process the lawyers from each party will ask them questions in order to rule out any person who show signs of prejudice.
<u>The jury is expected to be impartial and only be influenced by true evidence presented in court.</u> Once the trial is over, the jury will have to reach a verdict, sometimes unanimously.
The amount of members of the jury may vary depending on the law covering the case, but it usually consists of around 12 members.
<em>I think the answer is</em> instituting universal military mobilization
<em>I hope this helps </em>
Essentially, the Proclamation of 1763, issued by King George III, prevented colonists from settling past the so-called <em>proclamation line</em>, west of the Appalachian mountains, even though part of that land had already been assigned, and it also prohibited the purchase of land from American Indians by private hands.
However, it benefited Georgia by granting the state a very significant amount of land. For instance, it gave it all the lands between the rivers Altamaha and St. Marys, therefore extending its southern border. In addition, two of the four new colonies that were created after the Proclamation (East and West Florida) were located south of Georgia. Between those two Floridas and Georgia there was a very large area of undesignated land, which soon afterwards was also granted to Georgia.
I think you forgot to add the drop down menu
<span>a revolution from above is more likely to produce liberal democracy</span>