Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Employing internal based resources gives a better competitive edge to an organisation as those resources are already in place. This eliminates extra cost of getting new funding or resources as in option A.
Define the markets, people, and environments you are addressing
Is this argumentative ? are you supposed to be talking her into donating ? you could say that there’s proof that they do donate the money and use self worth and helping others and the good feeling you get from that to get her to donate
Answer: reduced by $80 billion
Explanation:
An expansionary gap is when the actual output is more than the potential output. From the question, we are told that an economy is operating with output $400 billion above its natural level, and fiscal policymakers want to close this expansionary gap and that the central bank agrees to adjust the money supply to hold the interest rate constant, so there is no crowding out.
We are also given the marginal propensity to consume is 4/5, and told that the price level is completely fixed in the short run.
To close the expansionary gap, the government would need to reduce its spending. To solve this, we have to calculate the multiplier. This will be:
Multiplier = 1/(1 - MPC)
= 1/(1 - 4/5)
= 1/1-0.8
= 1/0.2
= 5
Therefore, the government expenditure or spending will be reduced by:
= $400 billion/5
=$80 billion
Answer:
<u>Predatory</u>.
Explanation:
This predatory pricing strategy is used when a company aims to create entry barriers for new competitors, significantly lower the price to gain new customers and drive competitors away. The cons of this strategy is that in addition to being illegal, lost revenue is not always recovered, and there are other factors that drive competitors away, not just price.
