Answer:
109.9
Step-by-step explanation:
diameter of circle(d)=35
perimeter of circle(p)=?
we know,
p=pi d
=3.14×35
=109.9
Answer:
The puck traveled 53.8 meters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Currently, the player is 55 meters away from the opponent's goal.
After the shot, the puck is 120 centimeters = 1.2 meters from the opponents goal.
So, this means that the puck traveled 55 - 1.2 = 53.8 meters.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is d,(When both angle KMQ and MNS are equal to angle PMN, the angles KMQ and MNS are congruent.)
Step-by-step explanation:
I had this question on my practice exam for my midterm.
Answer:
Taking square-root of numbers
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason is that the square-root of most numbers is an irrational number because the answer we have can not be written as p/q form. For example, if we take the example of √2 then the answer we have is "1.4142135623730950..." which can not be written in p/q form. Hence taking square-root of numbers will most likely give an irrational number.
Answer:
79% - almost 4 times out of 5.
The key to this is realizing that the number of games will not always be 5.
If A wins in a sweep - you have 2/3*(2/3)*2/3 percent chance of that happening - 8/27, or 29.63%
If A wins in 4, now we have 2/3*(2/3)*2/3*(1/3)*3 - the 1/3 is the chance that B wins a game. Note - there are only 3 ways B can win a game, not 4. B cannot win Game 4 because Game 4 would not be played in case of a sweep. That is why you cannot use a straight Pascal’s triangle to get your coefficients - the 1–4–6–4–1 is not possible if B cannot win Game 4. Anyway, the math is the same as the above, a 29.63% chance of A winning in 4.
For a 5 game set, A could lose 2 games in 6 possible ways (lose 1&2, 1&3, 1&4, 2&3, 2&4 or 3&4). Again, A cannot lose Game 5 - it would not be played once A wins 3 games. So the odds become 2/3*(2/3)*2/3*(1/3)*(1/3)*6, or 19.75%.
Add them up and you get 79.01%
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps<3
