Massacres of Armenians were carried out in the late 1800s and early 1900s by the Ottoman government.
<h3>Armenian Genocide</h3>
- During World War I, the Ottoman Empire deliberately destroyed the Armenian people and their culture, which is known as the Armenian genocide.
- It was carried out chiefly through the forcible conversion of Armenian women and children to Islam, which was spearheaded by the ruling Committee of Union and Progress, and the massacre of about a million Armenians on death marches to the Syrian Desert.
- A string of military defeats and territory losses for the Ottoman Empire, especially the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913, instilled in CUP leaders a worry that the Armenians, whose country in the eastern provinces was seen as the heartland of the Turkish people, would seek independence.
To learn more about the Armenian Genocide refer to:
brainly.com/question/12445988
#SPJ4
Answer:
Neoconfucionismo
Explanation:
Neo-Confucianism was a very popular philosophy during Song dysnastia, being widely referenced in all forms of art, including painting.
The blank space, purposely left by the artists in the paintings, referred to the metaphysical nature of neoconfucionism, since it encompassed the metaphysical freedom concept, capable of leading human thought to enlightenment and rational development, based on what actually exists, such as emptiness.
Problems associated with the "urban machine" were that they were undemocratic and were corrupt. They moved the political system to allow candidates to win based upon vote-buying, coercion, and other corrupt methods. They were therefore effective or ineffective depending on the relationship you had with the machine and also whether or not you wanted to see a democratic system or not.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During an important time in the history of the colonies in North America, it came a time when the British owned most of the known territory in this region of the Americas. French people were more interested in maintaining the fur trade alive in order to make big profits. But the English were more interested in settling the land.
This British presence in most on the East coast territories meant more surveillance to the colonists, or at least that is how American colonists perceived it.
This represented a period of many hostilities, confrontations, and differences between the English crown and the 13 colonies. Yes, there were wars such as the Pontiac's War or the Seven Years War that increased the tensions between the colonies and the British government.
But what really upset and angered the colonists were the series of heavy taxations imposed by the English government such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, the Intolerable Acts, and many more. Colonists were infuriated by these "aggravations."
And what made things worse was the fact that colonists had no voice or opinion in the British Parliament.
And what about aggressions such as the one called the Boston Massacre?
Of course, these things were major causes for the Revolutionary War of Independence.
D most likely would be the correct answer
