The greatest difference between the 14 points and the ToV is the blame for the war. In the ToV Germany is blamed for the war and the Treaty is more a sentence than terms of an armistice, to where the 14 points was more a negotiated settlement for an armistice. The 14 points may have included and recognized the new German and would have brought that government into the negotiation process. Many aspects would have been difficult for Germany to agree to but instead of the agreement being forced upon them the new German government would have played a role in the resolution. It was the Germans that first accepted the 14 points for an armistice, knew the terms, and exiled there emperor I believe that there would have been strong support to honor the agreement by the German people. The ToV on the other hand was made to punish the Germans, Breakup the German Empire, and have the Germans pay for the war. It was also made to negate the role played by Wilson and the USA in the war. The ToV also allowed the Allied powers to keep their colonies and only the German colonies were, in some point in time, to be open for autonomous rule. The 14 points might have prevented WW2, the ToV was the punishment that bound the German people together to avenge the disgrace.
I hope I helped!
The cause is that he forgot his math book
the effect this had was that he couldn't do the homework
Answer:
1-D
2-A
3-B
4-C
Explanation:
Decimate: to thoroughly destroy something.
It is called decimate the action of causing large numbers of dead, injured or sick in a group of people or animals, especially in a population.
Defoliant: an artificial chemical designed to kill plant life.
A defoliant is any chemical that is fumigated or sprinkled on the plants in a way that induces their leaves to fall off. A classic example of a highly toxic defoliant is the Agent Orange.
Detrimental: having a negative or harmful effect on something.
It is called detrimental to something that causes or may cause harm.
Tentative: to be hesitant or uncertain in an action.
This word means the situation in which a person is not clear about his actions to be carried out.
"Trickle-down": supply-side economics creates tax cuts for the wealthy.
Supply-side economics suggests tax cuts for the wealthy. Those tax cuts will be used to create new jobs. New jobs will give more money to the middle-class.
This economic policy makes sense in theory and in some cases the tax cuts resulted in more jobs and higher wages. However, mostly it led to a large gap in wealth as the wealthy kept the money instead of reinvesting in jobs and wages. Eventually as the US moved industry overseas, tax cuts for the wealthy meant the expansion of jobs overseas instead of American jobs. Meanwhile the middle-class pay higher taxes to make up for the loss of taxes from the upper class.
<span> fundamentally evil is the answer</span>
