Answer: pattern or practice lawsuit
Explanation:
Pattern or practice case
This is a case whereby the plaintiff tries to show in court that they have been subjected into discriminatory situations which were committed by the defendant.
The plaintiff shows that the policies and procedures were actual used in committing such a discriminatory act towards them.
This case comprises discrimination of the following nature :
Housing discrimination
School segregation
Employment discrimination
A plaintiff will be required to provide evidence or any proof that shows that the defendant behaviour is actual an ongoing practice.
True. He came to teach people of his Father's love and care, and to turn them away from the Devil's power.
Aengus is speaking in monotone. He asks the audience a rhetorical question, but most of the audience members don't realize this because his voice does not go up at the end of the sentence. This is an example of using poor pitch and inflection.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The variation in the tone or pitch of people’s voice during various times in whole conversations where voice increases and decreases referred as inflection. It also describes a departure from normal or even track. Inflection or voice modulation gives the speech a dramatic character. This helps to make the speech more interesting.
When you use this, tone changes also help to express one’s point of view in a more expressive way. Pitch denotes the sound’s quality led by vibration rates which produces it i.e, tone’s high or low degree level. From all this, the scenario acts as an example to low pitch and the inflection. That’s why, Aengus speech does not reach to the audience.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
<span>The commander's conclusion is based on utilitarianism, which is the belief that whatever action benefits the most people is the morally correct action to take. Even if that action is harmful to oneself or even illegal.</span>
