<span>
according to the code of Mathematical Logic, there exists more properties, one of its principles is the consequence and effects property, or the so-called equivalence implicationwhich is defined as follows:Two expressions A and B are equivalent if A can produce B, and B can produce A. It means A implies B and B implies A.</span>
Answer:
D = sqrt[ (2-4)^2 + (7- (-1))^2] = ~8.2
Step-by-step explanation:
D = sqrt[ (Fx-Gx)^2 + (Fy- Gy)^2]
Answer: approximately 24
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to plot a regression line.
So we fit a model using the regression of Y on X, that an equation that predict Y for a given X using:
(Y -mean(Y ))= a(X-meanX)...........1
Where the formular of a is given the attachment.
N= the of individuals = 5
Y = amount of fat
X = time of exercise
mean(X )= sum of all X /N
= 131/5 = 26.2
mean(Y) = sum of all Y/N
= 104/5 = 20.8
a = N(SXY) - (SX)(SY)/ NS(X²) -(SX)²......2
SXY = Sum of Product X and Y
SX= sum of all X
SY = Sum of all Y
S(X²)= sum of all X²
(SX) = square of sum of X
a = -0.478
Hence we substitute into 1
Y-20.8 = -0.478 (X-26.2)
Y -20.8 = -0.478X - 12.524
Y = -0.478X + 33.324 or
Y = 33.324 - 0.478X (model)
When X = 20
Y = 33.324 - 0.478 × 20
Y = 33.324 - 9.56
Y = 23. 764
Y =24(approximately)
Carefully meaning of formula used in attachment to the solution they are the same.
Answer:
5x-6
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = 2x + 3
g(x) = 3x - 9
f(x) + g(x) = 2x + 3 + 3x-9
= 5x-6
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
