The oases offer drink, wildlife, shelter, and other commodities the harsh deserts don’t have, so there are most likely more people living around oases in these regions.
Brahmanism is a religion of transition between the Vedic religion (completed around the 6th century BC) and the Hindu religion (which began around the third century AD).
According to other authors, Brahmanism (or Brahmanical religion) is the same as Vedicism (or Vedic religion).
Maybe since the 4th century BC C. began to know the Upanishad, which were stories (written by Brahmins) where a Brahmin teacher taught his disciple about a unique God who was superior to the Vedic gods. They preferred meditation to opulent animal sacrifices and the ritual consumption of the soma psychotropic drug.
The Brahmins became the sole repositories of knowledge about the unique Brahman (the formless Divine, generator of all gods). There were no longer Chatrías who had spiritual knowledge, but had to become disciples of a Brahmin at some point in their lives.
From the third century or II a. C. they began to recite everywhere the extensive poems Majábharata and Ramaiana as well as the doctrinal treatises (agamas) of the different dárshanas (religious schools) that constitute a body of knowledge that has endured throughout history and has more than 280 million faithful.
I would help, But I can't read the words. Sorry :-(
I would assume that this is a multiple choices question, thus the answer would be letter the first statement after the claim. "because human behavior may be patterned, but it is also spontaneous". Creating a central dogma in sociology would be like creating a central dogma of explaining humanity. As there are always the spontaneous nature of humanity, making prediction out of patterned behavior could be flawed. <span />
