<span>Permanent damage to the amygdala
</span>
Amygdala is the integrative center
for emotions, emotional behavior, and motivation.T<span>he amygdala is a section of the brain that is responsible for detecting fear and preparing for emergency events. permanent damage of this brain section that deals with emotions has been correlated with a loss of interest in social interaction in the rhesus monkey.</span>
The correct answer is B) Averting behavior.
Environmental economists seek to implement a study to examine public preferences for alternative forest landscapes. Respondents are asked to choose one of several plans that depict environmental changes from the baseline condition of forests. The nonmarket valuation method that describes this study is Averting behavior.
When trying to find answers in this type of research to know the preferences of the public regarding alternatives to help the forest, the Avertin behavior method helps researches to find useful answers. When applying this research model, researches presume that people interviewed are prone to participate and do something that prevents the consequences mentioned in the question. It takes into consideration that people will do what it takes in order to limit or avoid the negative consequences presented.
Answer: Sutton's offense will not be recorded because it is part of what is called the dark figure of the crime.
Explanation:
In the field of criminology or sociology, the dark figure of the crime can be defined as the number of crimes that have not been reported or discovered.
Just as many reported crimes are seen daily and investigations to find out who has committed it, there are also times where crimes cannot be proven due to lack of evidence or perhaps they happened but were never reported.
Situations have been seen where innocent people are convicted of poor evidence or people who are guilty but lack of evidence cannot ensure that the person is guilty. There are also cases where there are crimes that are not reported because the person does not trust justice or the person may feel guilty for what happened to him.
In the case of Sutton, although it is true that at the end of the day he did not steal anything and that the owner of the house could not detect anything because everything was intact, this does not mean that the crime did not happen. If the owner of the house had security cameras or found Sutton in the house, it would have been proof that he was trying to steal even if he didn't carry anything.
If Sutton had been found there would be chances of being imprisoned or other judicial actions would have been taken because entering a house without permission and that is a crime.
