Perception in most cases is subjective, irrational, and marred with error. Examples to support the notion are given below:
- Some individuals argue that atoms don't exist because they are not visible
- Some argue that there is no God because He is not visible
- Some argue that there is no carbon monoxide in a room and even if there is, it cannot be smelt.
<h3>What is Perception?</h3>
Perception is a careful organization, identification, and interpretation of information in order to understand the presented information. It is what an individual thinks or feels about a piece of information or something else.
Some perceptions can be filled with flaws and in most cases are subjective and irrational. Even though on the surface it might feel like its true but it is actually the opposite.
Learn more about Perception here:
brainly.com/question/1838569
They would have used there natural resources such as logs and birch bark and animal hide
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which principle of supporting material organization did Mandy effectively use in her speech? Would be: Going from soft to hard evidence, or from personal experience, to concrete data and evidence
Explanation:
Mandy gave a speech in which she most likely wanted to persuade her audience about the importance and the magnificence of whales, as well as how important protecting them was. Because she wanted to first produce a connection between her audience and herself through familiarity and emotional connection, she uses her personal experiences with whales (soft evidence) and with it brings in an interest in her listeners that goes beyond what is purely factual and scientific. Then, when that personal connection has been accomplished, she starts to reveal the hard evidence she has on whales through the release of statistics, sources and facts, to further support the arguments she most likely made through her soft evidence. This is the characteristic of the principle of supporting material organization mentioned in the answer.
Both the Indian and the African congress were really huge congresses that both enjoyed having huge influences and power over their respective nations. Both congresses were also known to hold the ideologies of peaceful revolutions against the oppressive rulers. They believed that violence was not the answer and that peaceful negotiations can be done. Both also fought to remove the class system or the class division in their respective countries. The two congresses also fought against prejudice with regard to race, gender, and most importantly, social class.
