The Court serves as both a protector and an interpreter of the Constitution since it is the ultimate arbitrator of law and is responsible for assuring that the American people get the promise of equal justice under the law.
<h3>How is equal protection protected by the 14th Amendment?</h3>
In addition, no state may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial or deny them the equal protection of the law if they are a resident of its territory. No State shall pass or enforce any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens.
<h3>What kind of reaction did Ollie's have to the new civil rights laws?</h3>
Ollie McClung argued that because Congress lacked authority to create this rule under the Commerce Clause, his restaurant could not be banned from discriminating against African-Americans in this early challenge to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
<h3>How did the Supreme Court implement civil rights using the commerce clause?</h3>
The landmark United States Supreme Court ruling United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), established that the Commerce Clause gave the U.S. Congress the authority to compel private businesses to abide by Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race, religion, or national origin.
<h3>What was Ollie's owner's current opinion on the choice? What argument was he making?</h3>
Restaurants in Birmingham banded together to support Ollie's in an effort to uphold its anti-black customer policy known as Jim Crow. On December 14, 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant ruling as a result of it.
<h3>Why do you think we govern the equity of rights using the power of money?</h3>
Money is the ultimate power in an economic sense because, as Clowder (2) eloquently put it, "money buys things. If you are willing to pay the price and have the money, you can obtain anything in a market economy. You must request credit if you lack ultimate liquidity, or the required sum of money (means of payment).
<h3>How did this case change the way the government regulates?</h3>
By encouraging competition, the rule aimed to prevent monopolies. It also forbade the setting of discriminatory rates. Its most effective measures prohibited railways from setting up special rates among themselves and required that they submit annual reports to the ICC.
<h3>How does the Violence Against Women Act relate to the commerce clause?</h3>
1. Whether the Abuse Against Women Act's section 42 U.S.C. 13981, which grants victims of gender-based violence a private right of action, is a legitimate use of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
<h3>What is the current state of the commerce clause?</h3>
Amendment 10: The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution.
<h3>Do you believe that discrimination should be prohibited by the commerce clause?</h3>
The U.S. Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 is referred to as the "Commerce Clause" and grants Congress the authority "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.
To Know more about Constitution
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ13