1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
77julia77 [94]
3 years ago
13

As you approach an intersection, an oncoming vehicle suddenly turns left in front of you. They

Law
2 answers:
EleoNora [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. Brake hard and move to the left side of your lane. Aim for the space behind the turning vehicle

Explanation:

Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. Brake hard and move to the left side of your lane. Aim for the space behind the turning vehicle.

Explanation:

From the options given the one that best suits is B because the other options involve going against the oncoming traffic which is a very dangerous maneuver to do while driving. It is also forbidden.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
3. When you pull into the middle of an intersection to properly
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

The answer is B

declaring your intention to turn

Explanation:

When you enter the intersection, stay to the right of the center line. Keep your wheels straight to avoid being pushed into oncoming traffic should a rear-end collision occur. When approaching traffic clears or stops for a red light, complete your turn.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
5. Officer Williams patrols in a mostly Hispanic neighborhood. Although he has worked in the community for several years, he doe
Mazyrski [523]

Answer: He should take a course about cultural awareness.

Explanation: In the cultural awareness course he will most likely learn basic spanish along with ways to better his understanding of their community and ways of life.

5 0
3 years ago
What do you suppose are strengths of dispute resolution strategies? Select all that apply. When law enforcement and community ad
Dvinal [7]

The strengths of dispute resolution strategies are that dispute resolution rarely results in arrests and is less expensive than adjudication, and focuses on resolving miscommunication and misunderstanding issues.

<h3>What is dispute resolution?</h3>

Dispute resolution is a strategy to resolve differences between two or more groups regarding an issue peacefully and through dialogue.

This method is considered the most appropriate for solving problems because it prevents disputes from ending in violent confrontations and one of those involved being injured or killed. On the contrary, this method ensures that all parties involved get their demands or needs.

According to the above, it can be inferred that as a result of dispute resolution costs can be reduced, number of arrests and it is a way to clarify the message that each one wants to express.

Learn more about communication in: brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following notifies the defendant that he, she, or it is being sued?
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

summons

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are opinions or feelings about the candidates(2020 debate) ?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is forcing many police departments to "do more with less"?
    8·1 answer
  • What is true of public service?
    12·1 answer
  • Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Relatively few drivers are touched by the
    14·1 answer
  • What have some departments done to eliminate unethical conduct by it's officers
    10·1 answer
  • During probationary employment, an employee can be dismissed for
    10·1 answer
  • What are the terms of office for members of Congress?
    8·2 answers
  • 1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When
    12·2 answers
  • How does the Declaration of Sentiments use ethos?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!