The answer is no. They are not related.
NOTES: Global mean surface temperature from 1880 to 2018, relative to the 1951–1980 mean. The black line is the global annual mean, and the red line is the five-year local regression line.
The report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of October 2018 showed that the difference in impact between 1.5°C and 2°C was very large. That 0.5°C increase would imply that, for example, the length of droughts would double, the occurrence of extreme weather events would more than double, and all the coral would be gone. That is why the UNFCCC Paris Agreement (COP21) of December 2015 – to which more than 190 countries have subscribed – wisely set the target of holding temperature increases to “well below 2°C” with efforts to hold to 1.5°C.
To have a reasonable chance of holding below 2°C, we have to cut emissions by around 40% absolutely in the next two decades. Much bigger cuts are necessary for 1.5°C.
<em>BONUS: </em><em>Global warming is the process of raising the average temperature of the earth's atmosphere, oceans, and land. The global average temperature on the earth’s surface has risen 0.74 ± 0.18 ° C over the last hundred years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that "much of the increase in global average temperature since the mid-20th century is most likely caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases due to human activity" [1] through the greenhouse effect. These basic conclusions have been expressed by at least 30 scientific and academic bodies, including all national academies of science from the G8 countries.. The climate model used as a reference by the IPCC project shows that global surface temperatures will rise by 1.1 to 6.4 ° C between 1990 and 2100. </em>
<em />
<em>I hope this helps!! </em>
<em>Have a great day/night :)</em>
<em />
D. Introduce the bull again later I hope this helps!
Answer:
<em><u>The answer is</u></em>: <u>They not only serve for Regenerative Medicine, but also for the "screening" of new drugs, and some other things.</u>
Explanation:
Currently, studies in regenerative medicine are aimed at research and knowledge of induced pluripotent cells (iPSCs). For some, they are the cells called to take over from embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which until recently were the main objective of research in this field of biomedicine.
<u>Since the first cultures of mouse embryonic cells derived from blastocysts were obtained in 1981</u>, the foundations were laid for the development of the necessary methodologies that would lead later to generate human embryonic cells with characteristics similar to those of the mouse.
In addition to their interest in Regenerative Medicine, these types of cells are a tool of great value for the "screening" of new drugs, as well as a model to study the etiology of diseases that originate during the embryonic stage, and to study processes that occur during human embryonic development
.
<em><u>The answer is</u></em>: <u>They not only serve for Regenerative Medicine, but also for the "screening" of new drugs, and some other things.</u>
C : What is appropriate as determined by some standard of moral conduct.
